Featured Post

Can a Virtual Presence Satisfy the Requirements for Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress?

colin@pavlacklawfirm.com | Dec 31st, 2020
This week, we look to the California Court of Appeals’ recent decision in Ko v. Maxim Healthcare Services, Inc. to address whether parents who would otherwise be able to bring a claim for negligent infliction of emotional distress are prohibited from doing so simply because they witnessed the tortious harm through a livestream instead of in-person.
continue reading