This week’s discussion looks to the Indiana Court of Appeals’ decision in Wallen v. Hossler holding that a medical-malpractice plaintiff was free to reject a settlement offer from a healthcare provider that would pay the entire amount up to the cap. In the process, the court preserved the plaintiff’s right to choose trial by jury.
Focusing on two recent decisions from the Second and Third Circuits, this post looks to what happens to federal court jurisdiction under CAFA once class certification is no longer an option.
This discussion focuses on the Indiana Supreme Court’s ruling in Tunstall v. Manning and the question of whether an expert’s history of professional disciplinary actions was admissible.
In this 200th entry on the Hoosier Litigation Blog, we take a look at a handful of recent Indiana appellate decisions of note before turning our attention to the Indiana Supreme Court’s resolution of the lingering question whether a registered agent may still serve as a basis for preferred venue under Trial Rule 75(A)(4).